Interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967

Malinowski argued that ritual was a non-technical means of addressing anxiety about activities where dangerous elements were beyond technical control: "magic is to be expected and generally to be found whenever man comes to an unbridgeable gap, a hiatus in his knowledge or in his powers of practical control, and yet has to continue in his pursuit.". [38] Radcliffe-Brown in contrast, saw ritual as an expression of common interest symbolically representing a community, and that anxiety was felt only if the ritual was not performed. [39] George C. Homans sought to resolve these opposing theories by differentiating between "primary anxieties" felt by people who lack the techniques to secure results, and "secondary (or displaced) anxiety" felt by those who have not performed the rites meant to allay primary anxiety correctly. Homans argued that purification rituals may then be conducted to dispel secondary anxiety. [40]

Interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967

interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967

Media:

interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior doubleday 1967