Dante alighieri essay

Since Fields 1897 , biographers of Longfellow have had to grapple with the challenge of his extreme reluctance to speak about his inner life, a reticence that is regularly mistaken for mediocrity or the absence of true feeling by the less favorably inclined, as in Gorman 1967 and Arvin 1963 . The first wave of biographies, such as Longfellow 1891 (originally 1886; cited under Editions ) and Kennedy 1882 , delve delightedly into popular anecdotes about the poet and highlighted his pedigree (grandson of a state senator on his father’s side and of a Revolutionary War general on his mother’s) or celebrated him as the first true representative of the “literary life” in America (see Higginson 1902 , cited under General Overviews ). Those works gave way to ecstatic demolition jobs from the earlier part of the 20th century, such as Gorman 1967 , and occasional attempts to rehabilitate him as either darker or more inspirational than hitherto assumed, as in Thompson 1938 and Wagenknecht 1966 . The more recent biographical work of Calhoun 2004 , Irmscher 2008 , and Irmscher 2009 (cited under Longfellow as Cultural Icon ) stresses Longfellow’s cultural importance, his clever management of his poetic reputation as well as of his finances (see Charvat 1968 ), and his commitment to his role as a mediator between different languages and national literatures.

Dante alighieri essay

dante alighieri essay

Media:

dante alighieri essaydante alighieri essaydante alighieri essaydante alighieri essay